Trump call transcript pdf download

And we don't — I didn't agree about the , number that you'd mentioned. And I can go through that point by point. What we have done is we gave our state Senate about one and a half hours of our time going through the election issue by issue and then on the state House, the government affairs committee, we gave them about two and a half hours of our time, going back point by point on all the issues of contention.

And then just a few days ago we met with our U. Going back, primarily what you've talked about here focused in on primarily, I believe, is the absentee ballot process. I don't believe that you're really questioning the Dominion machines.

Then we did the recount, and we got virtually the same result. So I guess we can probably take that off the table. I don't think there's an issue about that. What you Trump: Well, Brad. Not that there's not an issue, because we have a big issue with Dominion in other states and perhaps in yours. But we haven't felt we needed to go there. And just to, you know, maybe put a little different spin on what Mark is saying, Mark Meadows, uh, yeah we'd like to go further, but we don't really need to.

We have all the votes we need. You know, we won the state. If you took, these are the most minimal numbers, the numbers that I gave you, those are numbers that are certified, your absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses, your out of state voters 4, You know when you add them up, it's many more times, it's many times the 11, number. So we could go through, we have not gone through your Dominion. So we can't give them blessing.

I mean, in other states, we think we found tremendous corruption with Dominion machines but we'll have to see. But we only lost the state by that number, 11, votes, and So with that being said, with just what we have, with just what we have we're giving you minimal, minimal numbers. We're doing the most conservative numbers possible, we're many times, many, many times above the margin.

And so we don't really have to, Mark, I don't think we have to go through Meadows: Right. Trump: Because, what's the difference between winning the election by two votes and winning it by half a million votes. I think I probably did win it by half a million. You know, one of the things that happened Brad, is we have other people coming in now from Alabama and from South Carolina and from other states, and they're saying it's impossible for you to have lost Georgia. We won.

You know in Alabama, we set a record, got the highest vote ever. In Georgia, we set a record with a massive amount of votes. And they say it's not possible to have lost Georgia. And I could tell you by our rallies. I could tell you by the rally I'm having on Monday night, the place, they already have lines of people standing out front waiting. It's just not possible to have lost Georgia. It's not possible. When I heard it was close I said there's no way.

But they dropped a lot of votes in there late at night. You know that, Brad. And that's what we are working on very, very stringently. But regardless of those votes, with all of it being said, we lost by essentially 11, votes and we have many more votes already calculated and certified, too.

And so I just don't know, you know, Mark, I don't know what's the purpose. I won't give Dominion a pass because we found too many bad things.

But we don't need Dominion or anything else. We have won this election in Georgia based on all of this. And there's nothing wrong with saying that, Brad. You know I mean, having the correct — the people of Georgia are angry. And these numbers are going to be repeated on Monday night. Along with others that we're going to have by that time which are much more substantial even.

And the people of Georgia are angry, the people of the country are angry. And there's nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you've recalculated. Because the 2, in absentee ballots. I mean, they're all exact numbers that were done by accounting firms law firms, etc. Raffensperger: Well Mr. President, the challenge that you have is, the data you have is wrong.

We talked to the congressmen and they were surprised. But they — I guess there was a person Mr. Braynard who came to these meetings and presented data and he said that there was dead people, I believe it was upward of 5, The actual number were two. Two people that were dead that voted. So that's wrong. There were two. Trump: Well Cleta, how do you respond to that? Maybe you tell me? Mitchell: Well, I would say Mr. Secretary, one of the things that we have requested and what we said was, if you look, if you read our petition, it said that we took the names and birth years and we had certain information available to us.

We have asked from your office for records that only you have and so we said there is a universe of people who have the same name and same birth year and died. But we don't have the records that you have. And one of the things that we have been suggesting formally and informally for weeks now is for you to make available to us the records that would be necessary —.

Trump: But Cleta, even before you do that, and not even including that, that's why hardly even included that number, although in one state we have a tremendous amount of dead people. So I don't know — I'm sure we do in Georgia, too. I'm sure we do in Georgia too.

But, um, we're so far ahead. We're so far ahead of these numbers, even the phony ballots of [name], known scammer. You know the Internet?

You know what was trending on the Internet? That was. The minimum number is 18, for [name], but they think it's probably about 56,, but the minimum number is 18, on the [name] night where she ran back in there when everybody was gone and stuffed, she stuffed the ballot boxes.

Let's face it, Brad, I mean. They did it in slow motion replay magnified, right? She stuffed the ballot boxes. They were stuffed like nobody had ever seen them stuffed before.

So there's a term for it when it's a machine instead of a ballot box, but she stuffed the machine. She stuffed the ballot — each ballot went three times they were showing: Here's ballot No 1. Here it is second time, third time, next ballot. I mean, look. We have a new tape that we're going to release. It's devastating. And by the way, that one event, that one event is much more than the 11, votes that we're talking about. It's uh, you know.

That one event was a disaster. And it's just, you know, but it was, it was something, it can't be disputed. And again we have a version that you haven't seen but it's magnified. It's magnified and you can see everything. For some reason they put it in three times, each ballot, and I don't know why. I don't know why three times. Why not five times, right? Go ahead. Raffensperger: You're talking about the State Farm video. And I think it's extremely unfortunate that Rudy Giuliani or his people, they sliced and diced that video and took it out of context.

The next day we brought in WSB-TV and we let them show, see the full run of tape and what you'll see, the events that transpired are nowhere near what was projected by, you know —. Trump: But where were the poll watchers, Brad? There were no poll watchers there. There were no Democrats or Republicans. There was no security there. It was late in the evening, late in the, early in the morning, and there was nobody else in the room.

Where were the poll watchers and why did they say a water main broke, which they did and which was reported in the newspapers? They said they left. They ran out because of a water main break, and there was no water main. There was nothing. There was no break. There was no water main break.

But we're, if you take out everything, where were the Republican poll watchers, even where were the Democrat poll watchers, because there were none. And then you say, well, they left their station, you know, if you look at the tape, and this was, this was reviewed by professional police and detectives and other people, when they left in a rush, everybody left in a rush because of the water main, but everybody left in a rush.

These people left their station. When they came back, they didn't go to their station. They went to the apron, wrapped around the table, under which were thousands and thousands of ballots in a box that was not an official or a sealed box. And then they took those. They went back to a different station. So if they would have come back, they would have walked to their station and they would have continued to work.

But they couldn't do even that because that's illegal, because they had no Republican poll watchers. And remember, her reputation is deva — she's known all over the Internet, Brad. She's known all over.

I'm telling you, "Where's [name]" was one of the hot items And I you know, I give everybody the benefit of the doubt. But that was — and Brad, why did they put the votes in three times? You know, they put 'em in three times. Raffensperger: Mr. President, they did not put that. We did an audit of that and we proved conclusively that they were not scanned three times. Trump: Where was everybody else at that late time in the morning? Where was everybody? Where were the Republicans?

Where were the security guards? Where were the people that were there just a little while before when everyone ran out of the room. How come we had no security in the room? Why did they run to the bottom of the table? Why do they run there and just open the skirt and rip out the votes? I mean, Brad. And they were sitting there, I think for five hours or something like that, the votes.

But they just all happened to run back and go, you know, Brad President, we'll send you the link from WSB. Trump: I don't care about the link. I don't need it. Brad, I have a much better link —. Mitchell: I will tell you. I've seen the tape. The full tape. So has Alex. We've watched it. And what we saw and what we've confirmed in the timing is that.

They made everybody leave, we have sworn affidavits saying that. And then they began to process ballots. And our estimate is that there were roughly 18, ballots. We don't know that. If you know that Trump: It was 18, ballots but they used each one three times.

Mitchell: Well, I don't know about that. Trump: I do think because we had ours magnified out. Each one magnified out is 18 times three. Mitchell: I've watched the entire tape. Trump: Nobody can make a case for that, Brad. I mean, look, you'd have to be a child to think anything other than that.

Just a child. I mean you have your never Trumper Mitchell: How many ballots, Mr. Secretary, are you saying were processed then? Raffensperger: We had GBI Germany: We had our — this is Ryan Germany. We had our law enforcement officers talk to everyone who was who was there after that event came to light. Trump: Well, there's no way they could — then they're incompetent.

They're either dishonest or incompetent, okay? Mitchell: Well, what did they find? Trump: There's only two answers, dishonesty or incompetence. There's just no way. There's no way. And on the other thing, I said too, there is no way. I mean, there's no way that these things could have been you know, you have all these different people that voted but they don't live in Georgia anymore. What was that number, Cleta?

That was a pretty good number too. Mitchell: The number who have registered out of state after they moved from Georgia. And so they had a date when they moved from Georgia, they registered to vote out of state. And then it's like 4,, I don't have that number right in front of me. Trump: And then they came back in and they voted. Mitchell: And voted. Trump: I thought that was a large number, though. It was in the 20s. The point is Germany: We've been going through each of those as well and those numbers that we got that Ms.

Mitchell was just saying, they're not accurate. Every one we've been through, are people that lived in Georgia, moved to a different state, but then moved back to Georgia legitimately. And in many cases. Trump: How many people do that? They moved out and then they said, "Ah, to hell with it I'll move back. It's crazy. Germany: This is they moved back in years ago. This was not like something just before the election.

So there's something about that data that, it's just not accurate. Trump: Well, I don't know, all I know is that it is certified.

And they moved out of Georgia and they voted. It didn't say they moved back in Cleta, did it? Mitchell: No, but I mean, we're looking at the voter registration. Again, if you have additional records, we've been asking for that, but you haven't shared any of that with us.

You just keep saying you investigated the allegations. Trump: But, Cleta, a lot of it you don't need to be shared. I mean, to be honest, they should share it. They should share it because you want to get to an honest election. I won this election by hundreds of thousands of votes. There's no way I lost Georgia. We won by hundreds of thousands of votes. I'm just going by small numbers when you add them up they're many times the 11, But I won that state by hundreds of thousands of votes.

Do you think it's possible that they shredded ballots in Fulton County? Because that's what the rumor is. And also that Dominion took out machines. That Dominion is really moving fast to get rid of their, uh, machinery. Do you know anything about that? Because that's illegal, right?

Germany: This is Ryan Germany. No, Dominion has not moved any machinery out of Fulton County. Trump: But have they moved the inner parts of the machines and replaced them with other parts?

Germany: No. Trump: Are you sure, Ryan? Germany: I'm sure. I'm sure, Mr. Trump: What about, what about the ballots. The shredding of the ballots. Have they been shredding ballots?

Germany: The only investigation that we have into that — they have not been shredding any ballots. There was an issue in Cobb County where they were doing normal office shredding, getting rid of old stuff, and we investigated that.

But this is stuff from, you know, from you know past elections. Trump: I don't know. It doesn't pass the smell test because we hear they're shredding thousands and thousands of ballots and now what they're saying, "Oh, we're just cleaning up the office.

President, the problem you have with social media, they — people can say anything. Trump: Oh this isn't social media. This is Trump media. It's not social media. It's really not it's not social media. I don't care about social media. I couldn't care less. Social media is Big Tech. Big Tech is on your side. I don't even know why you have a side, because you should want to have an accurate election. And you're a Republican. Raffensperger: We believe that we do have an accurate election.

Trump: No, no you don't. No, no you don't. You don't have. Not even close. You're off by hundreds of thousands of votes. And just on the small numbers, you're off on these numbers and these numbers can't be just — well, why wont?

So you sent us into Cobb County for signature verification, right? You sent us into Cobb County, which we didn't want to go into.

And you said it would be open to the public. And we could have our - So we had our experts there they weren't allowed into the room. But we didn't want Cobb County. We wanted Fulton County. And you wouldn't give it to us. Now, why aren't we doing signature — and why can't it be open to the public?

And why can't we have professionals do it instead of rank amateurs who will never find anything and don't want to find anything? They don't want to find, you know, they don't want to find anything. Someday you'll tell me the reason why, because I don't understand your reasoning, but someday you'll tell me the reason why.

But why don't you want to find? Germany: Mr. President, we chose Cobb County —. Trump: Why don't you want to find Germany: Sorry, go ahead. Trump: So why did you do Cobb County? We didn't even request — we requested Fulton County, not Cobb County. Go ahead, please. Germany: We chose Cobb County because that was the only county where there's been any evidence submitted that the signature verification was not properly done.

Trump: No, but I told you. We're not, we're not saying that. Mitchell: We did say that. Trump: Fulton County.

Stacey, in my opinion, Stacey is as dishonest as they come. She has outplayed you She got you to sign a totally unconstitutional agreement, which is a disastrous agreement. You can't check signatures. I can't imagine you're allowed to do harvesting, I guess, in that agreement. That agreement is a disaster for this country. But she got you somehow to sign that thing and she has outsmarted you at every step. And I hate to imagine what's going to happen on Monday or Tuesday, but it's very scary to people.

You know, where the ballots flow in out of nowhere. It's very scary to people. That consent decree is a disaster. It's a disaster. A very good lawyer who examined it said they've never seen anything like it. Raffensperger: Harvesting is still illegal in the state of Georgia.

And that settlement agreement did not change that one iota. Trump: It's not a settlement agreement, it's a consent decree. It even says consent decree on it, doesn't it? It uses the term consent decree. It doesn't say settlement agree. It's a consent decree. Raffensperger: It's a settlement agreement. Trump: What's written on top of it? Raffensperger: Ryan? Germany: I don't have it in front of me, but it was not entered by the court, it's not a court order.

Trump: But Ryan, it's called a consent decree, is that right? On the paper. Is that right? Germany: I don't. I don't. I don't believe so, but I don't have it in front of me. Trump: OK, whatever, it's a disaster. Here's the problem. We can go through signature verification and we'll find hundreds of thousands of signatures, if you let us do it.

And the only way you can do it, as you know, is to go to the past. But you didn't do that in Cobb County. You just looked at one page compared to another.

The only way you can do a signature verification is go from the one that signed it on November whatever. And compare it to two years ago, four years ago, six years ago, you know, or even one.

And you'll find that you have many different signatures. But in Fulton, where they dumped ballots, you will find that you have many that aren't even signed and you have many that are forgeries.

OK, you know that. You know that. You have no doubt about that. And you will find you will be at 11, within minutes, because Fulton County is totally corrupt and so is she, totally corrupt.

And they're going around playing you and laughing at you behind your back, Brad, whether you know it or not, they're laughing at you and you've taken a state that's a Republican state, and you've made it almost impossible for a Republican to win because of cheating, because they cheated like nobody's ever cheated before. And I don't care how long it takes me, you know, we're going to have other states coming forward — pretty good.

But I won't We have some incredible talent said they've never seen anything Now the problem is they need more time for the big numbers. But they're very substantial numbers. But I think you're going to find that they — by the way, a little information, I think you're going to find that they are shredding ballots because they have to get rid of the ballots because the ballots are unsigned.

The ballots are corrupt, and they're brand new and they don't have a seal and there's the whole thing with the ballots. But the ballots are corrupt. And you are going to find that they are — which is totally illegal, it is more illegal for you than it is for them because, you know what they did and you're not reporting it. That's a criminal, that's a criminal offense. And you can't let that happen. That's a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer.

And that's a big risk. But they are shredding ballots, in my opinion, based on what I've heard. And they are removing machinery and they're moving it as fast as they can, both of which are criminal finds. And you can't let it happen and you are letting it happen. You know, I mean, I'm notifying you that you're letting it happen. So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11, votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state.

And flipping the state is a great testament to our country because, cause you know, this is — it's a testament that they can admit to a mistake or whatever you want to call it. If it was a mistake, I don't know. A lot of people think it wasn't a mistake.

It was much more criminal than that. But it's a big problem in Georgia and it's not a problem that's going away. I mean, you know, it's not a problem that's going away. Germany: Mr President, this is Ryan. We're looking into every one of those things that you mentioned. Trump: Good. But if you find it you've got to say it, Ryan.

Let me tell you what we are seeing. What we're seeing is not at all what you're describing, these are investigators from our office, these are investigators from. GBI, and they're looking and they're good. And that's not what they're seeing. And we'll keep looking, at all these things. Trump: Well, you better check the ballots because they are shredding ballots, Ryan. I'm just telling you, Ryan. They're shredding ballots. And you should look at that very carefully.

Because that's so illegal. You know, you may not even believe it because it's so bad. But they're shredding ballots because they think we're going to eventually get In my opinion it's never too late. So, that's the story. Look, we need only 11, votes.

We have are far more than that as it stands now. We'll have more and more. Do you have provisional ballots at all, Brad? Provisional ballots? Raffensperger: Provisional ballots are allowed by state law. Trump: Sure, but I mean, are they counted or did you just hold them back because they, you know, in other words, how many provisional ballots do you have in the state? Raffensperger: We'll get you that number.

Trump: Because most of them are made out to the name Trump. Because these are people that were scammed when they came in. And we have thousands of people that have testified or that want to testify when they came in they were probably going to vote on November 3. And they were told I'm sorry, you've already been voted for, you've already voted. The women, men started screaming, No. I proudly voted til November 3.

They said, I'm sorry, but you've already been voted for and you have a ballot and these people are beside themselves. So they went out and they filled in a provisional ballot, putting the name Trump on it.

And what about that batch of military ballots that came in. And even though I won the military by a lot, it was percent Trump. I mean percent Biden. Do you know about that? A large group of ballots came in. I think it was to Fulton County and they just happened to be percent for Trump — for Biden, even though Trump won the military by a lot, you know, a tremendous amount.

But these ballots were percent for Biden. And, do you know about that? A very substantial number came in, all for Biden. Does anybody know about it? Mitchell: I know about it, but —.

I'm asking Brad. Do you know about the military ballots that we have confirmed now. Do you know about the military ballots that came in that were percent, I mean percent for Biden. Germany: I don't know about that, I do know that we have when military ballots come in, it's not just military, it's also military and overseas citizens.

The military part of that does generally go Republican. The overseas citizen part of it generally goes very Democrat.

This was a mix of 'em. Trump: No, but this was. That's OK. But I got like 78 percent in the military. These ballots were all for They didn't tell me overseas. Could be overseas too, but I get votes overseas too, Ryan, you know in all fairness. No they came in, a large batch came in and it was, quote, percent for Biden. And that is criminal. You know, that's criminal. Two newly-released PDF documents have also acquired a high profile, so it seems reasonable to take a look there as well.

This article covers the transcript of Trump's call with the President of Ukraine. As anyone can see, the scanner was really dirty, generating a lot of noise. It's not just to make it prettier and quicker to download. Clean scans OCR much, much better, improving searchability, text-extraction, compression and much more. C'mon, people! The nation's security could depend on the accuracy of a search performed on a document scanned by one of these filthy things!

As with the Mueller Report, from a technical point of view it was entirely unnecessary to scan the document. The PDF could have been "born digital" — created directly from the word-processor on which it was produced, making it automatically searchable, reusable, accessible and more. The subsequent additions to the original document for example, the classification information at the top and bottom of page 1, and the red "Unclassified" stamps throughout could have been handled digitally, without printing or scanning at all.

What did printing and scanning add to this document's workflow? This markup could have also been added to the PDF directly using digital markup tools available in any desktop PDF editor. If imaging scanning is a must, the scanner must be clean!

Due to the dirty scanner and their chosen workflow - involving rubber stamps and felt-pens - the OCR results are quite poor. Giuliani just. G1uliani will be able to travel to Ukraine and. This is why the letters, close up, don't look like letters in raw scans, but have unnaturally "smooth" edges. Perhaps the government could consider creating such records directly from voice-recognition software, embedding the audio file and digitally signing the resulting PDF as an authoritative, archival record of the call.

It's been reported that this document was produced at least in part by voice-recognition software. Perhaps so, but it's also clear from the document's header and footer that it was produced in a word-processor, and thus the voice-recognition output could have been edited prior to printing.

There's nothing about this PDF to demonstrate that it is a complete or accurate rendering of the phone-call it's intended to document. As with the Mueller Report first edition , this PDF document is untagged and thus inaccessible to users with disabilities, and therefore in violation of Section of the Rehabilitation Act.

As with the Mueller Report, this is a casualty of printing and scanning. No other PDF features are used by this document. It has no metadata, no outlines, no annotations, no tags, no attached audio recording of the call. It's not digitally-signed to protect against tampering. It can't deliver a good experience on a mobile phone. In the digital age, PDF may be the best vehicle for distributing 5 images of printed pages, but there's a lot more that can be done with a high-quality digital document, preferably without printing and scanning it!

Do you want to learn more about PDF, the digital document format you use everyday? PDF Association members are available world-wide to provide software, services and knowledge that help businesses leverage the world's preferred digital document format. The PDF industry is looking forward to hearing from you!